Head to head
Fedica vs Ocoya
Last updated 4 June 2026
Fedica combines audience analysis with fifteen-network publishing, recycling and a unified social inbox. Paid pricing varies by plan, account count and audience size; advanced research and API access have higher-tier requirements.
- From
- Free
- Free scheduling
- Yes
Ocoya combines AI production, social publishing and product/RSS workflows. Current Starter, Team and Agency plans meter credits; the WooCommerce trigger runs on first publication rather than later product edits.
- From
- Check current price
- Free scheduling
- No
Bottom line
Ocoya is the pick for teams preparing product-led content from structured briefs. Fedica fits analysts and audience-focused marketers better, and it's the only one of the two with a free scheduling plan.
A verified price comparison requires the same billing term, currency and eligible workload. See each pricing section for the published terms. Fedica adds evergreen recycling that Ocoya leaves out.
Key differences
Where the two actually diverge, before the full tables.
- Fedica has a free scheduling plan; Ocoya doesn't, though it offers a 7-day trial.
- Fedica posts to 15 networks, Ocoya to 11.
- Fedica has evergreen recycling; Ocoya doesn't.
Features compared
| Feature | Fedica | Ocoya |
|---|---|---|
| AI captions | Yes | Yes |
| Basic analytics | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced reports | Yes | Not assessed |
| Bulk upload | Not assessed | Yes |
| Evergreen recycling | Yes | No |
| Team roles | Not assessed | Not confirmed |
| Approvals | Yes | Not assessed |
| Link in bio | Not assessed | Yes |
Platforms compared
| Network | Fedica | Ocoya |
|---|---|---|
| Auto | Auto | |
| Auto | Auto | |
| X (Twitter) | Auto | Auto |
| Auto | Auto | |
| TikTok | Auto | Auto |
| Auto | Auto | |
| YouTube | Auto | Auto |
| Threads | Auto | Auto |
| Bluesky | Auto | Auto |
| Google Business | Auto | Auto |
| Mastodon | Auto | Auto |
| Telegram | Auto | Not assessed |
| Pixelfed | Auto | Not assessed |
| Tumblr | Auto | Not assessed |
| PeerTube | Auto | Not assessed |
Pricing
Prices use each tool’s billing unit. Annual equivalents are labeled as billed yearly; scaling rows show monthly costs and available annual rates.
Fedica
Free
- Scheduled posts
- 10
- Ten posts queued at once, replenished after publishing
- Free publishing coverage excludes some paid video/network formats
Publish
$10 a month billed annually
- Seats
- 1
- Accounts
- 15
- Scheduled posts
- 100
- One account per platform at displayed configuration
- Up to 100,000 combined followers
Grow
$19 a month billed annually
- Seats
- 1
- Accounts
- 15
- Scheduled posts
- 2000
- Follower analysis and growth tools
- Up to 100,000 combined followers
Research
$79 a month billed annually
- Seats
- Unlimited
- Accounts
- 15
- Scheduled posts
- 5000
- Research and collaboration tools
- Up to 300,000 combined followers
Custom
- Custom capacity and support
- USD rates depend on plan, accounts per platform and audience size; listed paid prices are the one-account-per-platform configuration.
- Queue allowances are concurrent scheduled posts, not monthly output caps.
- The pricing page still says 12 Free accounts while current network documentation covers 15 networks with paid-only formats; confirm Free eligibility by destination.
- Do not generalize analytics across all publishing networks. Research and API have narrower platform and plan requirements.
Ocoya
Starter
Displayed $29/month; currency and tax need confirmation.
- Seats
- 1
- Accounts
- 5
- One user and five profiles
- 300 credits; evaluate actual generation and workflow use
Team
PopularDisplayed $79/month; currency and tax need confirmation.
- Seats
- 5
- Accounts
- 20
- Five users and twenty profiles
- 1,500 credits
Agency
Displayed $199/month; currency and tax need confirmation.
- Seats
- 20
- Accounts
- 100
- Twenty users and one hundred profiles
- 5,000 credits
- Current plans are Starter, Team and Agency; credit allowances are 300/1,500/5,000 respectively.
- Displayed monthly prices are $29/$79/$199. Currency is not independently established here and annual totals are not derived from a discount slogan.
- Product and RSS workflows can generate content and save drafts or publish. Credit use and accepted output are separate quantities.
- The WooCommerce trigger fires when a product first goes live; later product edits do not re-post or establish synchronization of existing drafts.
Pros and cons
Fedica
- Fifteen publishing destinations
- Audience-management and research tools
- Unified inbox with network-specific support
- Pipelines and repeat scheduling
- Account and follower capacity affect price
- Analytics coverage is narrower than publishing coverage
- Free coverage wording differs across official pages
- Research/API features require higher tiers
Ocoya
- AI copy and visual production tools
- Product and RSS trigger workflows
- Workflow actions can save drafts or publish
- Current plans specify users, profiles and credit allowances
- Later WooCommerce product edits do not re-post
- Credits vary by production and workflow use
- Inbox coverage and eligible tiers need confirmation
- Current billing currency and annual totals need confirmation
Fedica vs Ocoya: FAQ
- Is Fedica or Ocoya cheaper?
- A verified price comparison is unavailable for these configurations. Check the current billing term, currency, required capacity and plan features before comparing totals.
- Does Fedica or Ocoya have a free plan?
- Fedica has a free plan; Ocoya does not, though it offers a 7-day trial.
- Which is better, Fedica or Ocoya?
- Fedica is the stronger pick for analysts and audience-focused marketers, while Ocoya is the better fit for teams preparing product-led content from structured briefs. We don't score them; the right call comes down to how you post.