Head to head
Birdeye vs RecurPost
Last updated 4 June 2026
Birdeye combines location-based reputation, listings and social management. Its current Social offering includes AI-assisted publishing and engagement, while pricing is quoted for the products and locations deployed.
- From
- Quoteon request
- Free scheduling
- No
RecurPost organizes reusable posts into libraries with recurring schedules and date-based stopping. Library Calendar shows longer-range output, while editing the next queued occurrence leaves the saved library version unchanged.
- From
- $7.50a month, billed yearly
- Free scheduling
- No
Bottom line
RecurPost is the pick for businesses maintaining reusable content libraries, and it reaches Bluesky and Threads, which Birdeye doesn't. Birdeye fits multi-location brands managing reviews, listings and social better.
A verified price comparison requires the same billing term, currency and eligible workload. See each pricing section for the published terms. RecurPost adds evergreen recycling that Birdeye leaves out.
Key differences
Where the two actually diverge, before the full tables.
- Birdeye posts to 6 networks, RecurPost to 10.
- Only RecurPost reaches Threads and Bluesky.
- RecurPost has evergreen recycling; Birdeye doesn't.
Features compared
| Feature | Birdeye | RecurPost |
|---|---|---|
| AI captions | Yes | Yes |
| Basic analytics | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced reports | Yes | Yes |
| Bulk upload | Not assessed | Yes |
| Evergreen recycling | No | Yes |
| Team roles | Yes | Yes |
| Approvals | Yes | Yes |
| Link in bio | Not assessed | Not confirmed |
Platforms compared
| Network | Birdeye | RecurPost |
|---|---|---|
| Auto | Auto | |
| Auto | Auto | |
| X (Twitter) | Not confirmed | Auto |
| Auto | Auto | |
| TikTok | Auto | Auto |
| Not confirmed | Auto | |
| YouTube | Auto | Auto |
| Threads | No | Auto |
| Bluesky | No | Auto |
| Google Business | Auto | Auto |
Pricing
Prices use each tool’s billing unit. Annual equivalents are labeled as billed yearly; scaling rows show monthly costs and available annual rates.
Birdeye
Custom quote
- Quote based on deployed products and locations
- Confirm Social, reporting, AI and integration entitlements in the proposal
- The current official pricing page is quote-based and does not publish a fixed dollar ladder. Older $299/$349/$449 estimates are not verified current prices.
- Pricing depends on products deployed at locations; the current page says it is not based on seat counts.
- Confirm billing term, currency, location count, social accounts and AI/API entitlements with sales.
RecurPost
Starter
$7.50 a month billed annually
- Seats
- 1
- Accounts
- 2
- Scheduled posts
- Unlimited
- $9/mo, $7.50 on annual ($90/yr)
- 2 social accounts (extra $4/mo each), 1 user
- 10 posts a day per account
Personal
Popular$20.83 a month billed annually
- Seats
- 1
- Accounts
- 5
- Scheduled posts
- Unlimited
- $25/mo, about $21 on annual ($250/yr)
- 5 social accounts (extra $4/mo each), 1 user
- 20 posts a day per account, content libraries, AI
Agency
$65.83 a month billed annually
- Seats
- 3
- Accounts
- 20
- Scheduled posts
- Unlimited
- $79/mo, about $66 on annual ($790/yr)
- 20 social accounts (extra $4/mo each), 3 users (extra $20/mo each)
- 80 posts a day per account, approval workflows, team collaboration
Enterprise
- Seats
- Not confirmed
- Accounts
- Not confirmed
- Scheduled posts
- Unlimited
- Custom pricing for 100+ accounts
- Custom users and limits
- Current plans are Starter $9/month, Personal $25 and Agency $79, plus custom Enterprise. No permanent free plan; the 14-day no-card trial pauses without payment rather than auto-charging.
- Annual billing gives two months free: $90/$250/$790 per year; rounded monthly equivalents are $7.50/$20.83/$65.83. USD selected; taxes extra.
- Included accounts/users: 2/1, 5/1, 20/3. Daily per-account post caps are 10/20/80. Extra accounts $4/month; extra members $20/month.
- Media overage is automatically billed at $5 per 50GB beyond included storage. X link tweets have a separately documented wallet charge; verify current fee and analytics consumption.
- Official plan table and FAQ conflict on lower-tier role availability; verify required permission controls. Preserve the documented library-versus-queued-edit distinctions.
Pros and cons
Birdeye
- Location-based reputation and social workflows
- Publishing and engagement with configurable AI review
- Social reporting and official API/MCP documentation
- Corporate brand rules with location-level configuration
- No fixed price ladder on the current official pricing page
- Product and location scope must be established in the quote
- Engagement actions differ by social network
- Some network and advanced reporting claims need a product-specific demonstration
RecurPost
- Weekly, monthly and custom library recurrence
- Date-based stop-recurring controls
- Library Calendar for longer-range recurring output
- Separate temporary queued edits from saved library content
- Permanent corrections require checking the saved source and already-queued occurrence
- Publication-count expiry is unverified in the cited guides
- Network repetition rules and required review permissions need separate confirmation
Birdeye vs RecurPost: FAQ
- Is Birdeye or RecurPost cheaper?
- A verified price comparison is unavailable for these configurations. Check the current billing term, currency, required capacity and plan features before comparing totals.
- Does Birdeye or RecurPost have a free plan?
- Neither has a free plan. At least one advertises a trial. Check each current trial offer and billing terms.
- Which is better, Birdeye or RecurPost?
- Birdeye is the stronger pick for multi-location brands managing reviews, listings and social, while RecurPost is the better fit for businesses maintaining reusable content libraries. We don't score them; the right call comes down to how you post.