Head to head
Agorapulse vs OpenTweet
Last updated 4 June 2026
Agorapulse combines publishing across ten networks with a shared inbox and ROI reporting. Paid self-service plans start at $79 per user/month annually; X access and additional profiles cost extra. Mobile-notification publishing covers some Instagram/TikTok formats.
- From
- Free
- Free scheduling
- Yes
OpenTweet focuses on X publishing through a calendar, REST API, CLI and MCP. It also cross-posts to Bluesky and LinkedIn personal profiles, with per-network delivery results.
- From
- Check current price
- Free scheduling
- No
Bottom line
OpenTweet is the pick for developers automating X content with API, MCP and feed connectors. Agorapulse fits teams that spend more time on engagement than on posting better, and it's the only one of the two with a free scheduling plan.
A verified price comparison requires the same billing term, currency and eligible workload. See each pricing section for the published terms. Agorapulse adds a social inbox that OpenTweet leaves out.
Key differences
Where the two actually diverge, before the full tables.
- Agorapulse has a free scheduling plan; OpenTweet doesn't, though it offers a 7-day trial.
- Agorapulse posts to 10 networks, OpenTweet to 3.
- Only Agorapulse reaches Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, Pinterest, YouTube, Threads, and Google Business.
- Agorapulse has a social inbox; OpenTweet doesn't.
Features compared
| Feature | Agorapulse | OpenTweet |
|---|---|---|
| AI captions | Yes | Yes |
| Basic analytics | Yes | Yes |
| Advanced reports | Yes | Not assessed |
| Bulk upload | Yes | Not assessed |
| Evergreen recycling | Partial | Yes |
| Team roles | Yes | Not assessed |
| Approvals | Yes | Not assessed |
| Link in bio | Yes | Not assessed |
Platforms compared
| Network | Agorapulse | OpenTweet |
|---|---|---|
| Auto | No | |
| Auto | No | |
| X (Twitter) | Auto | Auto |
| Auto | Auto | |
| TikTok | Auto | No |
| Auto | No | |
| YouTube | Auto | No |
| Threads | Auto | No |
| Bluesky | Auto | Auto |
| Google Business | Auto | No |
Pricing
Prices use each tool’s billing unit. Annual equivalents are labeled as billed yearly; scaling rows show monthly costs and available annual rates.
Free plan available.
- 1 seat · Standard
- $99/mo~$79/mo annual
- 3 seats · StandardTypical
- $297/mo~$237/mo annual
Lowest priced plan at each shown workload. Check the plan's included features before choosing it.
Agorapulse
Free
- Seats
- 1
- Accounts
- 3
- Scheduled posts
- 10
- 3 social profiles, 1 user
- 10 scheduled posts, 100 inbox items per month
- Permanent free plan, no card required
Standard
$79 per user a month billed annually
- Seats
- 1
- Accounts
- 10
- Scheduled posts
- Unlimited
- $79 per user/mo on annual, $99 monthly
- 10 social profiles, unlimited scheduling
- All-in-one inbox, basic reports, white-label exports
- 6-month data retention
Professional
Popular$119 per user a month billed annually
- Seats
- 1
- Accounts
- 10
- Scheduled posts
- Unlimited
- $119 per user/mo on annual, $149 monthly
- Adds link in bio, Instagram product tagging, grid preview, calendar notes
- Ad-comment moderation, post and inbox assignments
- Team performance reports, 12-month retention
Advanced
$149 per user a month billed annually
- Seats
- 1
- Accounts
- 10
- Scheduled posts
- Unlimited
- $149 per user/mo on annual, $199 monthly
- Adds labels, saved replies, automated moderation rules, bulk actions
- Shared calendars, publishing queues, scheduled report emails
- Advanced and ROI reporting, competitor benchmarking, 24-month retention
Custom
- Accounts
- Unlimited
- Tailored pricing for large teams
- Unlimited social profiles, AI reply suggestions
- SSO, custom roles, multi-step approval workflows
- Historical data import, Reports open API, sentiment analysis
- Dedicated Customer Success Manager and onboarding
- Paid list prices are per seat; annual rates are monthly equivalents of an annual commitment.
- Paid self-service plans include 10 social profiles. The official pricing PDF distinguishes additional profiles at $10/month on annual billing and $15/month on monthly billing; confirm the current checkout quote. X profiles are separately purchased and do not consume this profile allowance.
- There's a permanent free plan (3 profiles, 1 user, 10 scheduled posts, 100 inbox items a month) alongside a 30-day trial of Advanced features, no card required.
- Standard, Professional and Advanced annual rates are $79, $119 and $149 per user/month, versus $99, $149 and $199 monthly. Savings differ by tier.
- Current X documentation lists X Lite at $29 and X Plus at $69 per connected X profile/month (also quoted in EUR). Lite covers publishing; Plus adds inbox/reporting and starts collecting data when activated. Older official pricing PDFs show superseded X terms.
- Advanced Listening, Advocacy (employee advocacy), and Competitive Benchmarking are separate add-ons billed on quote with a demo required, not included in the base plans.
- USD base-plan rates are corroborated by the official pricing PDF. Confirm the current checkout quote; current help takes priority for conflicting X add-on details.
What it really costs
Monthly cost by seat count. Per-unit tiers grow with usage; flat tiers keep their whole-plan price within the published allowance, with the 3-seat row marked as a realistic setup.
| seats | Standard | Professional | Advanced |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | $99/mo | $149/mo | $199/mo |
| 3Typical | $297/mo | $447/mo | $597/mo |
| 5 | $495/mo | $745/mo | $995/mo |
| 10 | $990/mo | $1,490/mo | $1,990/mo |
| 25 | $2,475/mo | $3,725/mo | $4,975/mo |
| 50 | $4,950/mo | $7,450/mo | $9,950/mo |
Monthly billing.
OpenTweet
Pro
Displayed $19.99/month; confirm billing currency
- Accounts
- 1
- Scheduled posts
- Unlimited
- One X account; twenty posts/day
- Thirty URL posts/month; ten AI generations/day
- Evergreen pool ten posts, two repeats/day
Advanced
PopularDisplayed $29/month; confirm billing currency
- Accounts
- 3
- Scheduled posts
- Unlimited
- Three X accounts; one hundred posts/day
- Three hundred URL posts/month; fifty AI generations/day
Agency
Displayed $49/month; confirm billing currency
- Accounts
- 10
- Scheduled posts
- Unlimited
- Ten X accounts; three hundred posts/day
- Six hundred URL posts/month; one hundred fifty AI generations/day
- Plans scale X accounts, daily publications, URL-post allowance and AI/API limits. The current Pro monthly display is $19.99.
- Trial is seven days but omits evergreen and Articles and restricts link posts, search and analysis. Official trial billing descriptions conflict; review checkout.
- Bluesky and LinkedIn cross-posting is documented. Annual equivalents are displayed elsewhere as $15.83/$24.17/$40.83, but confirm currency and annual invoice before using numerical comparisons.
Pros and cons
Agorapulse
- Unified inbox for comments, DMs, mentions, reviews, and ad comments, built around inbox zero
- ROI reporting that ties posts and conversations to traffic, leads, and sales via Google Analytics
- Direct publishing to ten networks, Instagram Stories included
- Genuinely free plan plus a 30-day trial of the top tier
- Per-user billing and separate profile/X charges increase total cost
- Some listening, advocacy and reporting capabilities require additional entitlements
- Native audio and interactive formats can require mobile completion
- Approval and reporting limits depend on the plan
OpenTweet
- REST API, MCP, RSS and GitHub connectors
- AI model choice and daily generation allowances
- Evergreen queues and a visual calendar
- Seven-day trial; check checkout terms
- Detailed per-plan publication, URL and AI quotas
- No video cross-posting to Bluesky or LinkedIn
- Trial feature and billing restrictions
Agorapulse vs OpenTweet: FAQ
- Is Agorapulse or OpenTweet cheaper?
- A verified price comparison is unavailable for these configurations. Check the current billing term, currency, required capacity and plan features before comparing totals.
- Does Agorapulse or OpenTweet have a free plan?
- Agorapulse has a free plan; OpenTweet does not, though it offers a 7-day trial.
- Which is better, Agorapulse or OpenTweet?
- Agorapulse is the stronger pick for teams that spend more time on engagement than on posting, while OpenTweet is the better fit for developers automating X content with API, MCP and feed connectors. We don't score them; the right call comes down to how you post.